Greatest Armies, or Units Throughout History...

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
Varangian Guard end... It seems they were a casualty of the Fourth Crusade...

Link: http://www.soldiers-of-misfortune.com/history/varangian-guard.htm

But the Crusades also brought about the end of the Varangian Guard. In 1203 Venice succeeded in using the whole crusader army for the conquest of Constantinople. As a consequence of the usual internal intrigues the only reliable troops on the Byzantine side where the foreigners: the Guard - mostly English and Danish by this time - and the Pisans, who defended their trade privileges against Venice. When the Crusaders managed to enter the city in their first major assault, they suffered heavy losses and were driven back by the Varangians.

As so often happened, the rot started at the top. When Emperor Alexius III snuck away from Constantinople with his treasures, the Varangians were persuaded by the Imperial Treasurer to free the blinded opponent Isaac II from jail. Then Isaac's son, who was the Venetian candidate for the throne was crowned as Alexius IV. Unfortunately he had already made the Crusaders huge promises of land and money. While he tried to raise the necessary money, the Crusaders plundered the surrounding countryside, and in the city a profound hatred of the Latins and their protégé Alexius IV grew. Finally there was a palace coup in which, with the help of Varangians, a new candidate won the throne as Alexius V. He had secured their assistance by explaining to them that they would otherwise be replaced by Frankish knights. Because the prior promises of Alexius IV with the Crusaders were now revoked, the Crusaders started their final assault in April 1204. When they entered the city at various points, the Varangians retreated with the Emperor to the palace. Here they held their ground until the emperor and large parts of the nobility secretly left the city. After negotiations they surrendered to the Crusaders, and one can assume that many of them found further employment there. Afterward, there is no more firm evidence of the use of Scandinavians in Byzantine service. The Imperial Guard was later formed by Cretans.

Another source... wiki... it still seems the came after The Fourth Crusade (1202–1204)

They were prominent in the defence of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade. Of the role of the guard, it is said that "the fighting was very violent and there was hand to hand fight with axes and swords, the assailants mounted the walls and prisoners were taken on both sides".[13] The latest mention of the Varangian guard is in the Greek version of the Chronicle of the Morea, which states that this unit escorted the Prince of Achaia away to prison after the Battle of Pelagonia in 1259; historian D. J. Geanakoplos suggests they were reconstituted by Theodore I Laskaris to strengthen his claim as the rightful Emperor.[19] People identified as Varangians were to be found in Constantinople around 1400.[20]

Snip... an account as late as 1402, maybe 1453...

In Scandinavia, Russia, and later in England service in the Varangians was considered as both honorable and lucrative; and the Guard drew a steady stream of new men from the north. Their pay rate was extraordinarily high, and pillage and loot were among the remunerative “fringe benefits”. After one battle in 1016, the Emperor gave them a full third of the captured booty; retaining one third for himself and the final third distributed to the rest of the army! Also, at the accession of a new Emperor, the Varangians were granted the privilege of ritually “looting” the treasury: they were allowed to file in and carry off as much coin as they could carry in their two hands. The giant Harald Hardrada, the Norse prince and future king, served as a high-ranking officer in the Guard for many years in the 1030s; during which time he amassed such a fortune that he returned to Norway with the greatest personal wealth ever seen in Northern Europe before.
The Norman conquest of England had a profound and lasting effect on the Varangian Guard. In the years following 1066, the traditional military elite of the Anglo-Saxons found their place taken by the émigré Norman knightly aristocracy. Rendered redundant and unappreciated by William and his heirs, and in any case smarting under Norman rule, many Englishmen migrated away and took service in the Varangian Guard. By 1100, the English outnumbered both Scandinavians and Rus in the Guard.
As late as 1402, the Byzantine Emperor John VII wrote to King Henry IV (first of the Lancastrian kings of England) about the “axe-bearing men of the British race” that guarded both Constantinople and his person. It is likely that the last members of the Varangian Guard died fighting in the breaches of the walls of Constantinople in 1453; attempting to ward the last Emperor of the Romans in his heroic final stand.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
The Normans and Varangian Guard meet in battle more than once the first was at Cannae. The same place Hannibal defeated the Rome's but this time the Byzantines(Rome's) carried the day...

Battle of Cannae (1018) - Wikipedia

Snip...

The Normans lost their leader, Gilbert Buatère, and most of their group. However, what remained of this group of Normans was the first of many to go to southern Italy.

Link: https://byzantinemilitary.blogspot.com/2015/09/siege-of-bari-normans-vs-byzantines-in.html

The rebels used a newly arrived band of Normans sent by Pope Benedict, which combined with the Lombards to battle the Byzantines. A detachment of the elite Varangian Guard was sent to Italy to fight the Normans. The armies met at the Ofanto near Cannae, the site of Hannibal's victory over the Romans in 216 BC, and the Battle of Cannae was a decisive Byzantine victory. A historian wrote that only ten Normans survived from a contingent of 250.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
Before there were Holy military orders there was the Cult of St. Michael which many Normans followed. There a church off the coast of the Norman lands to St. Michael but it is said the Cult of St. Michael began in Itlay Shine of The Archangel Michael... at Monte Gargano...

Link to a book and a read pages 32 - 34 about the Normans and the Cult of St. Michael... it is worth the read...

https://books.google.com/books?id=9...e Cult of St. Michael and the Normans&f=false

Now I want to point out the Pope created the first holy military order to stop the Normans in Italy... way before the Templars... from wiki...

In 1053, for the Battle of Civitate, the Knights of Saint Peter (Milites Sancti Petri) was founded as a militia by Pope Leo IX to counter the Normans.

 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
The Turkish Sipahi... they are a 15th-century maybe even earlier cavalry unit...

Sipahi - Wikipedia

From Wiki...

Sipahi (Ottoman Turkish: سپاهی‎, romanized: sipâhi, Turkish pronunciation: [sipaːhi]) were two types of Ottoman cavalry corps, including the fief-holding provincial timarli sipahi, which constituted most of the army, and the regular kapikulu sipahi, palace troops. Other types of cavalry which were not regarded sipahi were the irregular akıncı ("raiders"). The sipahi formed their own distinctive social classes, and were notably in rivalry with the Janissaries, the elite corps of the Sultan.

The word is derived from Persian: سپاهی‎, romanized: sepāhī, meaning "soldier". The term is also transliterated as spahi and spahee; rendered in other languages as: spahiu in Albanian and Romanian, sepuh (սեպուհ) in Armenian, spahis (Σπαχής) in Greek, spahija or spahiya in Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, Bulgarian and Macedonian (Cyrillic: спахија, спахия). The Portuguese version is also sipaio (with variants like sipai, cipaio and cipai), but in Spanish it was adapted as cipayo. The word sepoy is derived from the same Persian word sepāhī.[1]In Dhivehi Language (Maldives) the army's soldiers are referred to as {ސިފައިން} "sifain"

The term refers to all freeborn Ottoman Turkish mounted troops other than akıncı and tribal horsemen in the Ottoman army. The word was used almost synonymously with cavalry. The sipahis formed two distinct types of cavalry: feudal-like, provincial timarlı sipahi (timariots) which consisted most of the Ottoman army, and salaried, regular kapıkulu sipahi (sipahi of the Porte), which constituted the cavalry part of the Ottoman household troops.

The equipment and tactics differed between the Anatolian and Balkan Timarli Sipahi. The Anatolian Sipahi were equipped and fought as classic horse archers, shooting while galloping, yet they weren't nomadic cavalry and their status was similar to medium cavalry class. Balkan Timarli Sipahis wore chainmail, rode barded horses and carried lances and javelins, and fought as medium cavalry.

Timarli Sipahis of the classical Ottoman period usually comprised the bulk of the army and did the majority of the fighting on the battlefield. While infantry troops at the army's center maintained a static battle line, the cavalry flanks constituted its mobile striking arm. During battle, Timarli Sipahi tactics were used, opening the conflict with skirmishes and localized skirmishes with enemy cavalry. Regiments of Timarli Sipahis made charges against weaker or isolated units and retreated back to the main body of troops whenever confronted with heavy cavalry. During one regiment's retreat, other regiments of sipahis may have charged the chasing enemy's flanks. Such tactics served to draw enemy cavalry away from infantry support, break their cohesion, and isolate and overwhelm them with numerical superiority. Anatolian Sipahis had the ability to harass and provoke opposing troops with arrow shots. More heavily equipped Balkan Sipahis carried javelins for protection against enemy horsemen during their tactical retreats. All cavalry flanks of the Ottoman army fought a fluid, mounted type of warfare around the center of the army, which served as a stable pivot.

Snip.. elite units...

Kapikulu Sipahis (Sipahis of the Porte) were household cavalry troops of the Ottoman Palace. They were the cavalry equivalent of the Janissary household infantry force. There were six divisions of Kapikulu Sipahis: Sipahis, Silahtars, Right Ulufecis, Left Ulufecis, Right Garips and Left Garips. All of them were paid quarterly salaries, while the Sipahis and Silahtars were elite units.


Snip... rivalry ...

Since Kapikulu Sipahis were a cavalry regiment it was well known within the Ottoman military circles that they considered themselves a superior stock of soldiers than Janissaries, who were sons of Christian peasants from the Balkans (Rumelia), and were officially slaves bounded by various laws of the devşirme.

Whereas the Sipahis (both Tımarlı and Kapıkulu) were almost exclusively chosen amongst ethnic Turkic landowners, they made great strides of efforts to gain respect within the Ottoman Empire and their political reputation depended on the mistakes of the Janissary. That minor quarrels erupted between the two units is made evident with a Turkmen adage, still used today within Turkey, "Atlı er başkaldırmaz", which, referring to the unruly Janissaries, translates into "Horsemen don't mutiny".

Towards the middle of the 16th century, the Janissaries had started to gain more importance in the army, though the Sipahis remained an important factor in the empire's bureaucracy, economy and politics, and a crucial aspect of disciplined leadership within the army. As late as the 17th century, the Sipahis were, together with their rivals the Janissaries, the de facto rulers in the early years of sultan Murad IV's reign. In 1826, after an evident Janissary revolt the Sipahis played an important part in the disbandment of the Janissary corps. The Sultan received critical assistance from the loyalist Sipahi cavalry in order to forcefully dismiss the infuriated Janissaries.

Two years later, however, they shared a similar fate when Sultan Mahmud II revoked their privileges and dismissed them in favor of a more modern military structure. Unlike the Janissaries before them they retired honorably, peacefully, and without bloodshed into new Ottoman cavalry divisions who followed modern military tradition doctrines. Older sipahis were allowed to retire and keep their tımar lands until they died, and younger sipahis joined the Asakir-i Mansure-i Muhammediye army as cavalry
.
 
Last edited:

Wehrkraftzersetzer

Hüter des Reinheitsgebotes
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1,173
Shouldn't we become a wee bit precizer?

greatest to what relation?

population supporting?
in numbers?
in "success" (well than there were two USAF planes over Japan
money spent ratio?
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
Shouldn't we become a wee bit precizer?

greatest to what relation?

population supporting?
in numbers?
in "success" (well than there were two USAF planes over Japan
money spent ratio?
I think you are over parsing the issue... It's subjective pick use whatever standard you would like to use... to make your selection...
 

Wehrkraftzersetzer

Hüter des Reinheitsgebotes
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1,173
I think you are over parsing the issue... It's subjective pick use whatever standard you would like to use... to make your selection...
than it is a hoplite formation against the Wehrmacht 1940, both the greatest at their time
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
than it is a hoplite formation against the Wehrmacht 1940, both the greatest at their time
You got to give details of why ... I know by the end of 1941 they were not... A short reign for the Wehrmacht... Why the hoplite? A little general you got Spartan, Athenians, and other Greek city states...
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
You know Alexander the Great did not use traditional hoplites in his army... He had the phalanx, shield barers and cavalry. You could argue he had the best army of it's day... He did conquered the known world...
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
Here is the first special forces unit in history under Alexander the Great, they were referred to as Shield Bearers... When you read Alexander's the Greta history if something special had to be done like climb a large rock to trap an army , it was these men that did it... link to the rock they climb... unless you read about Alexander these guys are forgotten in history... the rock it still there today...

Alexander the Great: Siege of the Sogdian Rock

The Hypaspists . A hypaspist ( Greek : Ὑπασπιστής "shield bearer" or "shield covered") is a squire, man at arms , or "shield carrier". In Homer, Deiphobos advances "ὑπασπίδια" or under cover of his shield. [1

Link to Hypaspists: https://www.ancient.eu/Hypaspist/

The hypaspists were a type of infantry soldier who served as a vital part of the Macedonian armies of both Philip II and his son and heir Alexander III, better known to most as Alexander the Great.

Although their exact origin and function have been called mysterious, the historian Stephen English in his The Army of Alexander the Great referred to them as being “among the most capable and heavily worked troops in the Macedonian order of battle…”

Most agree, however, that they were hand-picked not only for their speed and endurance but also for their strength and courage. Some claim they served as a select but separate unit of the phalanx, possibly a commando-type light infantry. Most agree that they formed a link between the heavy infantry in the center and the Companion Cavalry and Alexander on the right. Others suggest that they may have served on particular occasions or during specials events as part of a guard (police force), an agema. Their mobility, far better than that of the old pezhetairoi, allowed them to fight on rough terrain, in siege warfare, and in close hand-to-hand combat, in fact, anywhere where the sarissa was useless.

Three-thousand hypaspists - three units of one-thousand each - crossed the Hellespont with Alexander. They would be by his side at Granicus, Issus, Gaugamela and against King Porus in India.

Whether or not historians agree, the hypaspist was a unique soldier, specially trained and invaluable to the king.
 
Last edited:

Kirk's Raider's

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
922
My eldest son watches Vikings and season 5 was about the Heathen Army... Season 6 is about the Viking going to Russian and becoming the Rus...
Actually we got to give some respect to ISIS and Al Quidea. You don't have to love them but those sons of bitches can fight and fight well.Something like eight hundred ISIS fighters scared of approximately 50k Iraqi troops from Mosul in 2014.
No they are not invincible but they have a lot of guts . The nice thing about fighting them is one doesn't have to worry about this concept" of taking prisoners". No need for that.
Kirk's Raider's
 

Kirk's Raider's

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
922
"Guts" and intellectual capacity are not, nor have they ever been equal.
Very true. But guts can win battles. Unknown who the eventual winner will be between either Al Quidea and ISIS vs more or less friendly governments in Moslem majority nations.
On the other hand the Taliban has literally came back from the dead and is just waiting for the first exhausted Americans to leave Afghanistan.
Americans can't endure long wars vs the Moslem mindset that a war can easily last hundreds if years and that's perfectly fine.
Kirk's Raider's
 
Last edited:

O' Be Joyful

ohio hillbilly
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
3,491
Reaction score
3,136
Bagaddi and Bin Laden vs George W and Trump
My $ is on Delta Force and the Navy Seals, and gov't intelligence agencies for the win. The key word is intelligence, and that leaves a current "occupant" outta the equation.
 

Kirk's Raider's

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
922
My $ is on Delta Force and the Navy Seals, and gov't intelligence agencies for the win. The key word is intelligence, and that leaves a current "occupant" outta the equation.
Highly doubtful. Elite forces don't win insurgency warfare. Either indigenous governments and their security forces can beat the insurgency or they can't.
The US occupied Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. Cate to visit either country? If you do take a look at the US State Department travel advisory for both countries.
Kirk's Raider's
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
We can not do justice to this thread without mentioning the slave warriors the Egyptian Mamluks. Who defeated a crusader army, defeat a Mongol army, finished off the Crusader states in the Levant and created an Empire.

Three links about the Mamluks...

https://www.thoughtco.com/who-were-the-mamluks-195371

https://www.historytoday.com/miscellanies/who-were-mamluks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamluk

Snip... Who are the Mamliks

The most enduring Mamluk realm was the knightly military caste in Egypt in the Middle Ages, which developed from the ranks of slave soldiers. These were mostly enslaved Turkic peoples,[1] Egyptian Copts,[2] Circassians,[3] Abkhazians,[4][5][6] and Georgians.[7][8][9] Many Mamluks were also of Balkan origin (Albanians, Greeks, and South Slavs).[10][11] The "mamluk phenomenon", as David Ayalon dubbed the creation of the specific warrior class,[12] was of great political importance; for one thing, it endured for nearly 1,000 years, from the ninth to the nineteenth centuries.

The Mamluks were a class of warrior-slaves, mostly of Turkic or Caucasian ethnicity, who served between the 9th and 19th century in the Islamic world. Despite their origins as slaves, the Mamluks often had higher social standing than free-born people.

The dynasty had two phases. From 1250 to 1381 the Bahri clique produced the Mamluk Sultans; from 1382 until 1517 the Burgi Mamluks were dominant. These groups were named after the principal regiments provided by the Mamluks for the last Ayyubid sultan as-Salih whom they served before overthrowing in 1250; the Bahirya or River Island regiment, based on a river island in the centre of Cairo and the Burgi or Tower regiment.


Snip... big moments...

It's not a surprise that the Mamluks were key players in several important historical events. In 1249, for example, the French king Louis IX launched a Crusade against the Muslim world. He landed at Damietta, Egypt, and essentially blundered up and down the Nile for several months, until he decided to besiege the town of Mansoura. Instead of taking the city, however, the Crusaders ended up running out of supplies and starving themselves The Mamluks wiped out Louis's weakened army shortly thereafter at the Battle of Fariskur on April 6, 1250. They seized the French king and ransomed him off for a tidy sum. A decade later, the Mamluks faced a new foe. On September 3, 1260, they triumphed over the Mongols of the Ilkhanate at the Battle of Ayn Jalut. This was a rare defeat for the Mongol Empire and marked the south-western border of the Mongols' conquests. Some scholars have suggested that the Mamluks saved the Muslim world from being erased at Ayn Jalut; whether or not that is the case, the Ilkhanates themselves soon converted to Islam.

But Mamluks had first appeared in the Abbasid caliphate in the ninth century and even after their overthrow by the Ottomans they continued to form an important part of Egyptian Islamic society and existed as an influential group until the 19th century. They destroyed the Crusader kingdoms of Outremer, and saved Syria, Egypt and the holy places of Islam from the Mongols. They made Cairo the dominant city of the Islamic world in the later Middle Ages, and under these apparently unlettered soldier-statesmens’ rule, craftsmanship, architecture and scholarship flourished. Yet the dynasty remains virtually unknown to many in the West.

The Mamluks start other dynasties... first rulers...

Egypt
Bahri Dynasty[edit]
Burji Dynasty[edit]
South Asia
Main article: Mamluk Sultanate (Delhi)
In 1206, the Mamluk commander of the Muslim forces in the Indian subcontinent, Qutb al-Din Aibak, proclaimed himself Sultan, becoming in effect the Mamluk Sultanate in Delhi, which lasted until 1290.

Iraq
Main article: Mamluk dynasty of Iraq

1704 Hasan Pasha

Mamluk corps were first introduced in Iraq by Hasan Pasha of Baghdad in 1702. From 1747 to 1831 Iraq was ruled, with short intermissions, by Mamluk officers of Georgian origin[8][33] who succeeded in asserting autonomy from the Sublime Porte, suppressed tribal revolts, curbed the power of the Janissaries, restored order, and introduced a program of modernization of the economy and the military. In 1831 the Ottomans overthrew Dawud Pasha, the last Mamluk ruler, and imposed direct control over Iraq.[34]

City State Acer

1805 Sulayman Pasha al-Adil, mamluk of Jezzar Pasha


These other Mamluk leaders were other Muslim slave warriors form other Muslim societies...
 
Last edited:

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
4,568
ROBIN HOOD>>>

William of Cassingham resistance fight and his 1000 Bowmen... He fought with the royalist against the French and put fear into them when they had to travel from one place to another it's said he and his men kill thousands of the Frenchmen...

William of Cassingham (or Willikin of the Weald) (died 1257) was a country squire of Cassingham (now Kensham) in Kent at the time of the First Barons' War. During that conflict he raised a guerrilla force of archers which opposed the otherwise total occupation of the south-east by Prince Louis of France. A contemporary chronicler, Roger of Wendover, wrote of him:

“ A certain youth, William by name, a fighter and a loyalist [to King John] who despised those who were not, gathered a vast number of archers in the forests and waste places [of the Kent and Sussex Weald], all of them men of the region, and all the time they attacked and disrupted the enemy, and as a result of their intense resistance many thousands of Frenchmen were slain. Roger of Wendover, Flores Historiarum, II. 182 (Rolls Series, London, 1887). ”
On the death of John and accession of Henry III in October 1216, much of Louis' English support fell away and he decided to march from London to the south coast to sail to France for reinforcements. On the way, William's force ambushed Louis near Lewes, routing them and pursuing them to Winchelsea, where they only escaped starvation thanks to the arrival of a French fleet. When Louis sailed back to England to renew a siege of Dover Castle in May 1217, he found William attacking and burning the French camp there, and so decided to land instead at Sandwich and march to the castle from there.

At the end of the war, William was granted a pension from the crown and made warden of the Weald and (on 28 May 1241) Sergeant of the Peace (predecessor title to that of Provost Marshal, now head of the Royal Military Police) in reward for his services. Until his death he filled this post, collected his pension and fulfilled minor duties such as fetching logs for the royal household. Holinshed's Chronicles writes of him "O Worthy man of English blood!".

I bring him up because he was most likely the inspiration for the Robin Hood tales...

Here is a nice article about him inspiring the Robin Hood tale...

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/12/08/william-of-cassingham/

He was a squire from Cassingham (today known as Kensham) in Kent during the time of the First Baron’s War (1215-1217), which was a civil war in England during which several prominent landowners and noblemen were split in their support for King John of England and the future Louis VIII of France, who had invaded England in a bid to seize the crown from John.
The Weald is a part of Kent and Sussex, which stretches from London to the English Channel. It was heavily forested, with little population, and this area became the battlefield for William of Cassingham in his fight against the French.

Snip...

A monk by the name of Roger of Wendover wrote at the time that William, “a certain youth, a fighter, and a loyalist,” refused to give fealty to Prince Louis, and instead brought together a group of archers, 1,000 in total, as a guerrilla army. Just like the actions of the better-known Robin Hood, William and his group would attack the French as they moved through the forests of the Weald.

Snip...

However, whereas the passage of time (and the influence of Hollywood) has painted Robin Hood as a rather chivalrous character, William of the Weald was known to be quite brutal. Labeled an outlaw, just like Robin Hood, he did not take any prisoners; any French soldiers who were captured or who surrendered would be killed. His group simply did not have the means to guard any captives, nor feed them.

According to period chronicles, William was also known to take items that the French had stolen and return them to their rightful owners.

Read the article and see how he help finish off the French efforts to take England... https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/12/08/william-of-cassingham/

The woods... https://thefreelancehistorywriter.c...hero-of-england-a-guest-post-by-michael-long/


Video...






 

jgoodguy

Webmaster
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
7,143
Reaction score
4,164
ROBIN HOOD>>>

William of Cassingham resistance fight and his 1000 Bowmen... He fought with the royalist against the French and put fear into them when they had to travel from one place to another it's said he and his men kill thousands of the Frenchmen...

William of Cassingham (or Willikin of the Weald) (died 1257) was a country squire of Cassingham (now Kensham) in Kent at the time of the First Barons' War. During that conflict he raised a guerrilla force of archers which opposed the otherwise total occupation of the south-east by Prince Louis of France. A contemporary chronicler, Roger of Wendover, wrote of him:

“ A certain youth, William by name, a fighter and a loyalist [to King John] who despised those who were not, gathered a vast number of archers in the forests and waste places [of the Kent and Sussex Weald], all of them men of the region, and all the time they attacked and disrupted the enemy, and as a result of their intense resistance many thousands of Frenchmen were slain. Roger of Wendover, Flores Historiarum, II. 182 (Rolls Series, London, 1887). ”
On the death of John and accession of Henry III in October 1216, much of Louis' English support fell away and he decided to march from London to the south coast to sail to France for reinforcements. On the way, William's force ambushed Louis near Lewes, routing them and pursuing them to Winchelsea, where they only escaped starvation thanks to the arrival of a French fleet. When Louis sailed back to England to renew a siege of Dover Castle in May 1217, he found William attacking and burning the French camp there, and so decided to land instead at Sandwich and march to the castle from there.

At the end of the war, William was granted a pension from the crown and made warden of the Weald and (on 28 May 1241) Sergeant of the Peace (predecessor title to that of Provost Marshal, now head of the Royal Military Police) in reward for his services. Until his death he filled this post, collected his pension and fulfilled minor duties such as fetching logs for the royal household. Holinshed's Chronicles writes of him "O Worthy man of English blood!".

I bring him up because he was most likely the inspiration for the Robin Hood tales...

Here is a nice article about him inspiring the Robin Hood tale...

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/12/08/william-of-cassingham/

He was a squire from Cassingham (today known as Kensham) in Kent during the time of the First Baron’s War (1215-1217), which was a civil war in England during which several prominent landowners and noblemen were split in their support for King John of England and the future Louis VIII of France, who had invaded England in a bid to seize the crown from John.
The Weald is a part of Kent and Sussex, which stretches from London to the English Channel. It was heavily forested, with little population, and this area became the battlefield for William of Cassingham in his fight against the French.

Snip...

A monk by the name of Roger of Wendover wrote at the time that William, “a certain youth, a fighter, and a loyalist,” refused to give fealty to Prince Louis, and instead brought together a group of archers, 1,000 in total, as a guerrilla army. Just like the actions of the better-known Robin Hood, William and his group would attack the French as they moved through the forests of the Weald.

Snip...

However, whereas the passage of time (and the influence of Hollywood) has painted Robin Hood as a rather chivalrous character, William of the Weald was known to be quite brutal. Labeled an outlaw, just like Robin Hood, he did not take any prisoners; any French soldiers who were captured or who surrendered would be killed. His group simply did not have the means to guard any captives, nor feed them.

According to period chronicles, William was also known to take items that the French had stolen and return them to their rightful owners.

Read the article and see how he help finish off the French efforts to take England... https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/12/08/william-of-cassingham/

The woods... https://thefreelancehistorywriter.c...hero-of-england-a-guest-post-by-michael-long/


Video...





Very Interesting.
 
Top