Andersonh1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
- Messages
- 580
- Reaction score
- 742
We hear a lot of accusations today that Confederate memorials that dot the Southern landscape are "monuments to white supremacy", placed there "to intimidate the black population", and therefore they are racist and should be removed.
As I found out when I looked into these accusations about Silent Sam, the Confederate memorial formerly located on the campus of UNC Chapel Hill until a mob tore it down, those accusations are at odds with the documentation, which was not difficult for me to track down. The majority of it is online and digitized. A quote about whipping a black woman, made by Julian Carr, is cited as evidence that Silent Sam is a racist statue, and said quote is repeated over and over again in story after story about that particular monument. Yet when I found the list of speakers for the dedication of Silent Sam, I discovered there were six speakers that day, and one introductory speaker, for a total of seven. I found five speeches in their entirety, and two partial copies. Julian Carr's quote, the one said to "reveal all" about Silent Sam, is the only portion of any of the dedication speeches that mentions race. None of the other speakers have anything to say about it. This leads to the obvious question: why is only Julian Carr quoted, and why only the two or three paragraphs it took to share his anecdote? Is it dishonesty on the part of various writers, in cherry-picking that quote? Is it laziness, a lack of interest in doing the research to get the full context of the day? Are most of these journalists and columnists perfectly happy to accept Carr's quote as telling the story and see no need to dig any further?
If they got Silent Sam so wrong, and they did, what about all the other hundreds of Confederate monuments? I have no faith that we're getting the truth about them any more than we got the truth about Silent Sam, and I've been trying to collect what paperwork I can find on these monuments to see what the people who put them up actually had to say about the purpose and meaning was. A lot of it is out there, digitized and available for anyone who wants to take the time to go look.
So I want to post some of what I've found here. If, as Viper suggests, it falls on deaf ears, so be it. Who knows who might browse this forum, lurk a bit, and learn something?
As I found out when I looked into these accusations about Silent Sam, the Confederate memorial formerly located on the campus of UNC Chapel Hill until a mob tore it down, those accusations are at odds with the documentation, which was not difficult for me to track down. The majority of it is online and digitized. A quote about whipping a black woman, made by Julian Carr, is cited as evidence that Silent Sam is a racist statue, and said quote is repeated over and over again in story after story about that particular monument. Yet when I found the list of speakers for the dedication of Silent Sam, I discovered there were six speakers that day, and one introductory speaker, for a total of seven. I found five speeches in their entirety, and two partial copies. Julian Carr's quote, the one said to "reveal all" about Silent Sam, is the only portion of any of the dedication speeches that mentions race. None of the other speakers have anything to say about it. This leads to the obvious question: why is only Julian Carr quoted, and why only the two or three paragraphs it took to share his anecdote? Is it dishonesty on the part of various writers, in cherry-picking that quote? Is it laziness, a lack of interest in doing the research to get the full context of the day? Are most of these journalists and columnists perfectly happy to accept Carr's quote as telling the story and see no need to dig any further?
If they got Silent Sam so wrong, and they did, what about all the other hundreds of Confederate monuments? I have no faith that we're getting the truth about them any more than we got the truth about Silent Sam, and I've been trying to collect what paperwork I can find on these monuments to see what the people who put them up actually had to say about the purpose and meaning was. A lot of it is out there, digitized and available for anyone who wants to take the time to go look.
So I want to post some of what I've found here. If, as Viper suggests, it falls on deaf ears, so be it. Who knows who might browse this forum, lurk a bit, and learn something?